Here's what I'm currently reading, you might find the listed books interesting...Some are for work and the others are for fun. I'm sure you can figure out which is which.
Here's what I'm currently reading, you might find the listed books interesting...Some are for work and the others are for fun. I'm sure you can figure out which is which.
State Senator Ernie Chambers -- a state legislator from Nebraska -- has filed suit against God in the County District Court in Omaha, Nebaska. (read story here). God doesn't has decided that He shouldn't answer to our courts and that they have no jurisdiction over Him.
I tend to agree with God. Senator Chambers is "blaming God for human oppression and suffering". God contends that He gave us free will. Again, I agree with God. Man is to blame for our own oppression and suffering. We can choose to help the helpless or we can stand idly by and let them suffer. It's our own free will that controls how we act. If you're not part of the solution, you're part of the problem.
What a country we live in!
God Bless
Check this link: http://www.news.com.au/story/0,23599,22439270-2,00.html. Apparently, a lesbian couple are being ungrateful because they ended up having two babies instead of just one. They claim that they told the doctor to only implant one embroyo, the doctor implanted two and now they have one baby too many.
First, I'd like to call them the most ungrateful bitches on the planet. There are a lot of people in this world who can't even have one baby.
Second, what the hell are they thinking? Some people don't even think lesbians (or gay men) should even be parents, so why make us all look bad by suing? I'm sure that at sometime today, I will be called upon to defend these two jerks and there is no defense for it. I hope the court kicks the case out.
Third, if they don't want the extra kid, I'll take the baby and raise it as my own.
There have been a lot of things going on lately and I meant to write about them, but I didn't get the chance. This article caught my eye and I just couldn't remain silent.
God Bless
Judge Robert Hanson struck down an Iowa law that declared marriage off limits for same sex couples. According to CNN, Judge Hanson ruled that same-sex couples can marry based on the state constitution's guarantee of equal treatment.
Man, I hope that guy was appointed to his seat and not elected. If he was elected, he won't be an Iowa judge for much longer.
Then again, I'll bet people in California would have never guessed that Wisconsin would be the first state to make it illegal to deny housing and jobs to gays, so maybe the people of Iowa will rise up and take a stand on the right side of the issue. (In case you have been following, the right side of the issue would be to be for gay marriage.)
The Polk County Attorney, John Sarcone, will be asking for a stay and he will be appealling.
I never thought a lawyer wouldn't support civil rights, but then I don't know that many lawyers.
I, also, don't know that many people in Iowa. My sister-in-law is from there and I've ordered a signed print from a gallery there -- the man that sold it to me was very nice -- but I don't know much else.
God Bless Iowa and Judge Robert Hanson!
And, while He's at it, God Bless the rest of us, too.
Reading in this nation has been falling off for quite sometime -- even in the face of the Harry Potter phonenom. According to an article on CNN.com, one in four people didn't read a single book last year. The average number of books read was four books.
Being a book lover, I wonder about someone who has only read four books in a year. If the books are romance or fiction, the number seems too small. If the books are nonfiction, then that seems a little more likely, since those are generally larger and become slower reads.
According to the article, people in the South read more than other regions of the country. However; Democrats and Liberals read more than Republicans and Conservatives. That is something I found very interesting. First, I thought most of the South was made up of Conservatives, so how do Liberals come out on top? Second, it makes sense that Liberals read more than Conservatives. There has been an anti-intellectual "movement" (for lack of a better term) in this country for years.
Let's explore that.
Since when has it ever been a bad thing to be smart? Since when has discussions of philosphy, religion and politics ever hurt? It seems as if people don't want to be smart. That might explain some of the book reading dropoff -- although, I think 160 cable channels and video games need to shoulder some of the blame.
Well, I guess it really don't make me no never mind if the rest of the country doesn't enjoy reading as much as I do. Currently, I'm reading one book on CD, another book at home, one that I read at lunch and one that stays in the car for when I have to wait. I keep my local library humming with activity.
Feel free to join me.
God Bless
As you may or may not know, I have subscribed to NewsMax.com's email service. I did this to read the "conservative" side of the news. I write conservative in quotes because I think the makers of NewsMax.com are just playing into people's fears and not really reporting news.
Anyway, I received one more email from them that stated: "Urgent - You Need to Read This". Thinking that this might be a notification that their email list was compromised or something big has happened in the news and I missed it, I opened the email. Here's what I saw:
From "NewsMax.com" <newsmax@reply.newsmax.com>
Sent Thursday, August 23, 2007 2:58 pm
Subject Urgent - You Need to Read This
Dear NewsMax Reader:
Please find below a special message from our sponsor, Early to Rise. They have some important information to share with you.
Thank you.
NewsMax.com
URGENT!
Dear NewsMax Reader:,
We almost had a rebellion on our hands and thankfully I just put the fire out. You see, I recently sent you an invitation to join a profit-party like none other and WE HAVE NEVER SEEN ANYTHING LIKE THE RESPONSE. It was overwhelming. And we ran out of places too fast...
Many were disappointed as those golden gates closed. Perhaps you were one of them?
That's why I had to plead to have more places released (I actually wondered if I would start getting hate-mail otherwise!). So what's all the fuss about...?
Well, once in a blue moon, you have a revelation. Something which makes you kick yourself and ask: "I can't believe I've been so blind! How could I have missed this?"
I'm talking about a whole new trading ball-game here... if you're interested in setting up an AUTOMATED extra few grand a month in your spare time, this will undoubtedly be the most important report you read.
So you think this might be about trading shares or commodities? Think again! You're about to walk into a whole new investment world; the LARGEST and most amazingly uncomplicated trading on the planet!
A mountain of solid-gold has passed us by for a long time... but not anymore!
This Insider slapped a brown paper envelope on my desk- a highly confidential report. I read... and realized I was about to make a select number of my subscribers the proposition of a lifetime... so here I am.
I must warn you though, what you're about to read is... well, a little stirring. Just remember though, it's ENTIRELY legal (or I wouldn't be mentioning it to you!) and completely factual.
Just click here.
It'll only take a few minutes to read, but I assure you, it's like nothing you've ever read!
Sincerely,
Patrick Coffey
NewsMax Reader
This e-mail was sent by:
NewsMax.com
4152 West Blue Heron Blvd, Ste 1114
Riviera Beach, FL, 33404 USA
99712
Now, I added the italics, just so you knew what was mine and what was sent. I, also, removed the blah, blah, email sent with permission from the bottom, the rest is the actual email, minus my personal email address.
There's a link, which I've disabled. The link leads to a site that promises great wealth if you buy their CDs. This isn't news and it certainly shouldn't have been sent with a Urgent notice on it. When I sign up for Newsletters, I realize a certain amount of spam will come along, but this is just ridiculous!
God Bless
I was watching the last part of "The American President" yesterday and it got me to thinking.
Why is it that belonging to the NRA is considered being a conservative, yet, if you belong to the ACLU, you're a liberal?
Our founding fathers put freedom of religion, speech and the right to assemble as our number one amendment. In all our rights as Americans, this one came first. The ACLU works tirelessly to defend the First Amendment. As Americans, we should all support their efforts -- in theory, as I don't believe we should just mindlessly follow any group. Have I agreed with the ACLU always? No, I haven't, but I know that they work to protect my right to disagee.
Our Second Amendment is the right to bear arms in order to form a militia. Now, I don't see the need for a citizen militia, as we have the National Guard, as well as our Military, but I don't think any lawabiding citizen should not be allowed the right to own a weapon. The NRA works tirelessly to defend the Second Amendment. As Americans, we should all support their efforts, just like we should support the ACLU.
Now, I used to be a member of the NRA, as I believe I've mentioned before. I dropped my membership when I believe the NRA went a bit too far in their zeal to protect the Second Amendment by supporting armor piercing bullets. Just like I don't think one should be allowed to yell FIRE in a crowded theatre (unless there really is a fire), I don't think one should be allowed to own Armor piercing bullets.
But, I don't think this is a conservative issue, nor is it a liberal issue. Defending our Constitutional rights is an American issue. We should get involved to ensure that illegal wiretapping isn't done by our government. We should ensure that our right to bear arms is not removed. We should ensure that our right to agree or disagree with our government is protected.
So, I don't understand why these two groups have become so polairized that they are considered one side or the other.
I once had a conversation with a current member of the NRA, who hated the ACLU. I found that humorous, for without the First Amendment (and those who work to protect it), the NRA itself could be outlawed. Which is to say, without the "liberal" group, the "conservative" group might not exist. Doesn't that mean that in the large picture, we all need each other? I think so.
So, if you're a member of the ACLU, thank a member of the NRA (my mother always taught me that one reason no one has invaded us is because we have the guns to defend our homes). And, if you're a member of the NRA, thank a member of the ACLU.
I'll say a little prayer for both groups.
God Bless.
Karl Rove: Democratic Secret Weapon
Karl Rove gave the Republican Party the political equivalent of the credit card teaser rate! It sure seemed good in the short term but reality sets in over the long run. Yes, "political genius" Karl Rove is the Democratic secret weapon that spells many, many Democratic victories over the next generation.
The big problem for an evil "genius" is that they are evil and the American people really are not evil. Yes, Americans can be deceived and manipulated with scare tactics, lies, dirty tricks and simplistic slogans.. for awhile. In the long term, those efforts always backfire. When these "darkside" political tactics get transferred from election strategy to policy, they will inevitably blow-up in the face of their users. Karl Rove never learned this lesson from the era of Richard Nixon.
We should realize that Karl Rove was not the only top Republican to misunderstand the lessons of the greater Watergate scandal. Dick Cheney, George W. Bush, most Republicans in Congress and the Republican National Committee are equally blind. In the Republican Party, they are all Rovians! Hurrah for us Democrats that they are!
Voter suppression, tampering with the voter rolls, intimidation, fear, slander, lies, deception and obsessive secrecy were keys to Republican victories in 2000, 2002 and 2004. These "darkside" tactics led to the Rovian Republican dream of a permanent Right Wing Majority ruling
Even the short term victories from 2000 to 2004 were only possible because Democrats had not held firm against the creeping subversion by the Republican Right of our courts and regulatory agencies. Democrats should never have permitted Right Wing radicals like Thomas and Scalia to have become Supreme Court Justices before 2000. Bush did not legitimately take control of the Presidency in 2000.
Rovian tactics like the illegal, false felon purge by Katherine Harris in
In policy terms, the triumph of Rovian policy meant secret government by and for the economic elite. Trillions in tax cuts for the wealthiest of the wealthy and a few extra dollars in tax breaks for the rest of us were the first order of business. Most of us saw our tiny tax breaks disappear into our gas tanks as the oil companies who bankrolled the Rovian Republican Revolution financially raped us.
There was an immediate drop in Bush's approval rating. Only the 9-11 attacks saved Bush from one-term status and allowed the Rovian Revolution to last past the first few months.
Bankruptcy laws were changed to screw-over debtors. Polluters got pretty much everything they wanted. Trade pacts were signed all over the third world so companies could ship good American jobs out of the country while flooding us with cheap, often dangerous imports. Within a couple of years, the 9-11 scare tactics and secrecy were not being truly effective in keeping Americans in line politically.
Karl Rove, Dick Cheney and George W. Bush dreamed up a war in
Then the results of Rovian Republicanism became apparent.
The true nature of the Rovian Revolution which is Bush Republicanism has been revealed. It is out of touch with real American values.
Americans support Social Security and do not want it privatized. They support universal health care. They do not want the Bill of Rights trampled on by power crazed public officials. Americans do not want endless war. Americans want a strong defense but realize stupid can never be strong. Most Americans want to be union members. Most citizens want to protect American manufacturing and American jobs. Americans want renewable energy, safe products and bridges that will not collapse under them. They want honest elections where everyone gets to vote and have their vote counted. Americans like balanced budgets. They want to rich to pay their fair share of the tax burden. Americans want to be able to sue corporations when those corporations wrong them.
Americans do not want the kind of Republican rule that Karl Rove was selling. Americans in increasing numbers like the Democratic approach over the Republican one. Thank goodness, the Democrats had their secret weapon.. Karl Rove (and crew).
Written by Stephen Crockett (co-host of Democratic Talk Radio http://www.DemocraticTalkRadio.com ). Email: midsouthcm@aol.com . Mail:
Feel free to publish without prior permission at no charge.
A Senate Judiciary Committee subpoenaed both Scott Jennings and Karl Rove, according to a CNN article. However, Mr. Rove thinks that he is somehow above the law and "refused to show up".
Well, that must be a nice feeling to be above the law. If you or I had been subpoenaed and we didn't appear, I'm sure we're be sitting in jail right about now.
This executive privilege crap has got to go. Our founding fathers never wanted to create an imperial presidency, but that's what we have now. And, it's wrong, wrong, wrong, wrong.
God Bless
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
I get these email updates from a magazine called Newsmax. Now, I signed up for it to get the "other" side's version of the truth. (I still say that for the most part, the only non-leaning magazine is US News & World Report.) Anyway, I'm pretty sick of this updates. They have extreme headlines, such as "Al Gore's Lie", and a lot of times all the updates do is tout some book I'm not interested in reading. I don't think Newsmax represents the right wing as a whole, just the radical right fringe.
Today's headline was the aforementioned "Al Gore's Lie". It is about how Global Warming doesn't exist and isn't a worry for any of us.
How can anyone on this planet not believe in Global Warming?
Global Warming is a naturally occurring event. The earth has been warming up for thousands of years. That being said, just because Global Warming occurs naturally, does not mean that it isn't affected by what we do. In fact, we've made it worst over the years.
I took a science class while in college and had a professor that would be classified as right wing. He was very conservative in his views. He assigned us what I thought at the time was the worst final paper ever. We had to write and prove scientifically whether or not man caused Global Warming.
So, I did my research, which included an experiment on how the earth cools and warms, and I had to conclude that man did not cause Global Warming.
However; using the same experiment, I concluded that while man didn't cause Global Warming, he's certainly made it worst.
So, I really don't understand what the fight is all about.
Don't we want clean air to breath for ourselves and our children?
Don't we want clean water to drink?
Don't we want to invent products that do no harm to the planet?
How can anyone in their right mind argue with that?
Let's just say, hypothetically, that Global Warming doesn't exist. What difference would it make? Why wouldn't we want to make the air cleaner and our water safer to drink?
It just stands to reason.
God Bless
The White House papers should be turned over NOW - not later. By them
not turning over the uncensored papers, it makes me wonder what they
have to hide. By not allowing Harriet Miers to testify, what are they
hiding?
Even if you think that Bush is God's right hand man, you have to
realize that he is acting more like a dictator than a President.
Absolute Power Corrupts Absolutely.
I'm posting this, but I'm not sure if it is true or not. If anyone of my readers can confirm this, I'd really appreciate it.
NBA OR NFL?
36
have been accused of spousal abuse
7
have been arrested for fraud
19
have been accused of writing bad checks
117
have directly or indirectly bankrupted at least 2 businesses
14
have been arrested on drug-related charges
8
have been arrested for shoplifting
Neither, it's the 535 members of the United
StatesCongress.
The same group of Idiots that crank out hundreds of new laws each year
designed to keep the rest of us in line.
AND THEY JUST VOTED THEMSELVES $15,000 PER MONTH PENSION FOR LIFE AFTER SERVING ONLY ONE TERM IN CONGRESS!! *
* - I'm not sure about this part. Although, if it is true, I want to run for Congress.
God Bless
Situations like this are the very reason gays and lesbians should not be denied marriage. Family values my ass. The mean spirited people who do things like this do not know the meaning of the words family values."From The Olympian: ``Langbehn, a social worker, said officials at . . . [JMH] did not recognize her or their jointly adopted children as part of Pond's family. They were not allowed to be with her . . . and Langbehn's authority to make decisions for Pond was not recognized . . .
``Even after a friend in Olympia faxed the legal documents that showed that Pond had authorized Langbehn to make medical decisions for her, Langbehn said she wasn't invited to be with her partner or told anything about her condition. She said she wasn't allowed to see Pond again until a priest arrived to give . . . Last Rites.''"
There are very few things on which every American can agree. We fight over the War in
Free speech is the reason I can post this blog – whether you agree with it or not. It is the reason you can post your own response, either through adding a comment or writing on your own blog. Free speech means that we all have a voice (or in theory we should have a voice) in our government. We can all stand up and show our support or our dissent for a sitting President.
To quote Michael Douglas in "An American President", " 'You want free speech? Let's see you acknowledge a man whose words make your blood boil, who's standing center stage and advocating at the top of his lungs that which you would spend a lifetime opposing at the top of yours.'"
And, that is what freedom of speech is all about.
Except, somewhere along the line, AT&T and Verizon (& I'm sure other companies) have forgotten that this is not just their country. They want to limit our access to the Internet. They want to sell bandwidth to the highest bidder. If you want to view a site, you're not going to get there unless the site's owner has paid an extra fee to a communications company.
That may be capitalism, but it certainly isn't freedom.
Sometimes, when things are quiet and I have a few moments to think, I wonder what the greatest threat to our way of life is. I've come to decide that it isn't terrorists. We were attacked on 9/11 and
No, the greatest threat to
And not one shot will have been fired.
I write a lot on this blog about what's wrong with our country. I write about how our leaders have let us down and what we need to do to fix things. I'm sure that some of my readers agree and some don't and that's the beauty of it. The freedom I have to voice my opinion and you to voice yours. We don't have to agree, we don't even have to like each other, but I would defend to my death your right to say what you believe and vice versa (I hope).
But, if a communications company stands in the way, who's views will get through? Only those who can afford the extra fees? Only those voices that follow the ideology of the companies in charge?
I just read somewhere that Clear Channel just cancelled a billboard because they a) didn't agree with it and b) received complaints. Do you want them controlling what you can and cannot see on the Internet?
I don't.
Oh, and don't think it'll make surfing the web safer for children. Porn is over a billion dollar industry. I'm sure the porn sites will have the money to pay the fees.
We need to tell Congress, the President and the FCC that we – all of us – still believe in the freedom of speech. That we want our right to gather and assemble on the Information Superhighway. We don't want our voices and words hijacked by corporations. The Internet is free and it should stay that way.
God Bless all of us and God Bless
author's note: I will be posting a link to Save the Internet at a later time. I don't have it handy as I post this.
We've heard a lot about immigration these days. It's on the front page of the paper, top story on the news and the Presidential candidates are all discussing it. President Bush is calling for his way to be passed -- it is stalled in the Senate.
Sometimes, I wonder just what a big deal this is. Why is it that we only worry about illegal immigrants once every twenty years or so? Why aren't we spending as much time on lowering our national debt as we pay lip service to immigration?
Lou Dobbs put this much better than I can regarding what to do about illegals, but basically, he said:
I think Lou Dobbs is right on the money. This is a smart man and I wish he -- or someone very much like him -- would run for President.
But, that'll probably never happen. People talk about making tough choices all the time, but they usually think someone else should be making them.
God Bless